Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 985, Taylor J. .Cited An Informer v A Chief Constable CA 29-Feb-2012 The claimant appealed against dismissal of his claim for damages against the police. The plaintiff tried to escape in order to avoid arrest. However, the existence of a general duty on the police to suppress crime did not carry with it liability to individuals for damage caused to them by criminals whom the police had failed to apprehend when it was possible to do so. The plaintiffs shop was burnt out when police fired a canister of CS gas into the building in an effort to flush out a dangerous psychopath who had broken into it. Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire - In this case a dangerous gunman was hiding from police on the defendants land. That was so not only where the deliberate act was that of a third party, but also when it. In-text: (Alexandrouv oxford, [1993]) Your Bibliography: Alexandrouv oxford [1993] 328 4 (CA). Facts: The claimants from X v Bedfordshire CC [1995] (their claims in negligence having been struck out) brought an action against the UK alleging violation of article 6 of the ECHR (the right to a fair trial), 3 (freedom from inhuman and degrading treatment), 8 (respect for private and family life), and 13 (right to compensation in the event of a violation of one of the substantive rights). Even if such a duty did exist public policy required that the police should not be liable in such circumstances. Although a police officer was entitled to use such force in effecting a suspected criminals arrest as was reasonable in all the circumstances, the duty owed by the police officer to the suspect was in all other respects the standard duty of care to anyone else, namely to exercise such care and skill as was reasonable in all the circumstances. meross smart switch manual; triple crown softball world series 2022. wilmington, nc obituaries past 30 days . 1. Furthermore . Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire (1985) The police negligently released CS gas on a highway. rigby v chief constable of northamptonshire case summary