Tobin's Mother Goose Liverwurst, Does Uv Light Kill Pinworm Eggs, What Did Mickey Hargitay Died Of, Articles W

This brought about a little unrest within working class support but it was the effect on middle class attitudes and the cracks opening among the Parliamentary partys support which began to harm electoral credibility. 1983: the biggest myth in Labour Party history | Red Pepper Why did Labour (Britain) lose in 1951? : r/AskHistorians Under Labour, rationing continued, with further dried egg and bread rationing introduced in 1946. An Overlooked Reason Why Labour Lost In 1983 - Blogger The Fall of the Attlee Government, 1951 | SpringerLink Similarly, Labour simply made too many promises that were out of their reach, however they did fulfil most of their promises. Labour to the Conservatives - was enough to tip Labour out of office in the general election held in October 1951. Labour - 295 seats, Conservatives - 321 seats, Liberals - 6 seats In 1951 the Liberals put up 109 candidates, in 1945 they had put up 475. History-UK-BK1-Labour-1951 election. Their living standards had not radically altered since 1945, and the significance of many of these voters is that they voted in marginal constituencies. The result of the election caused much surprise. Just by losing a core of middle class voters, Labour lost a great many marginal contests and most particularly in the well-to-do constituencies of southern and south-eastern England. social reforms were needed. This led to complacency with Labour relying too heavily on support from voters who felt betrayed. In 1945 Labour had won 11.99m (47.8%) of the vote, and went on to attain 13.95m (48.8%) of the vote in 51. why did labour lose the 1951 election. The population was also swelling, not to mention the return of service men and women from abroad, and the total number of properties in Britain had fallen by over 700,000 due to bomb damage. 1950-1951 labelled as an UNHAPPY PARLIAMENT Labour majority reduces to just 7 seats 1950 By changing the timing of the election to be in 1951 rather than spring of 52' due to the Kings tour of Australia it hit the party at a time of economic downfall- seen to be short lived as by 1952 the 419 million defecit was yet again in the surplus Ministers